Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure

The lawsuit says Thinx underwear, long marketed as safe and sustainable, contains harmful chemical substances known as PFAS. The company denies those allegations but will pay up to $5 million.

We Had 44 Period and Incontinence Products Tested for Forever Chemicals. Many Were Contaminated.

Thinx period pants lawsuit: do they contain toxic chemicals?

Thinx period underwear was supposed to be 'non-toxic'. Now customers feel betrayed, Menstruation

Toxic chemicals in period underwear? What to know as U.S.-based Thinx settles lawsuit - National

Thinx settles lawsuit over period underwear marketing: What to know - The Washington Post

Thinx Period Underwear Has Settled in a Lawsuit Over Harmful Chemicals & Twitter Has Thoughts

Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure : NPR

Thinx PFAS Lawsuit Also Calls Attention to Nanosilver Concerns - Women's Voices for the Earth

Fighting Forever Chemicals in Menstrual Products, by Leveled Legislation, Leveled Legislation

Thinx, Inc. to Settle PFAS/PFOA Lawsuit

Australian period underwear makers deny using 'forever chemicals' after Thinx settles suit in US, PFAS

Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure : NPR